McCain's Probability of Dying His First Term
John McCain would be 72 if assumes the presidency. What is the probability that he will die before he finishes his first term? The proper way to estimate the probability McCain would die in office is to use mortality rates of people at his age. The most current and authoritative data I found are published by the Human Mortality Database at www.mortality.org sponsored by the University of California, Berkeley and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
Using their 2005 data, (you have to register to use it), three percent of 72-year-old men died before their 73rd birthday. Using the numbers for each year for four years, 86% of current 72-year-olds would still be alive at their 76th birthday, the end of one term. Eighty-two percent of them would not die before the first year of a second term. That means the probability of a 72-year-old man dying within five years is 18%, or about one in fivefour. This is roughly equivalent to flipping a coin two times and getting “tails, you lose” both times.
McCain is aged. Reporters have noted his confusion and he has displayed it when talking about Muslim sects while in Iraq. The Wall Street Journal reports his Republican handlers eliminated his impromptu open bus interviews with reporters. Handlers have reduced his open press conferences. He read a written statement on Georgia, which is touted as evidence of his foreign policy expertise. However, after he read it he refused to answer questions and immediately walked away from the microphone without acknowledging who wrote it.
Not only does his age raise questions about his ability to lead, it raises questions about who our next president will be. Sarah Palin would have about a one-in-five chance of becoming president in the first term of a McCain presidency without winning a single vote as a presidential nominee.




I get closer to 18%. 0.035 * 2 + 0.054 * 2
The odds of someone dying before their 75-79 birthday is not 23% if they have already reached their 72 birthday. It's lower.
I went back to my formulas and found that I had used data from an file that was in 5-year blocks. When I used the data from the annual results, I ended up with numbers similar to yours. The newly posted article reflects the percentages.
Thanks for the comment.
Reply to this
Should your third sentence of the second paragraph read like this instead of like you wrote it (you just typo-ed and forgot a “not”. I made the correction below:
"Seventy seven percent of them would NOT die before the first year of a second term."
I agree. Thanks for catching it. I was alerted to it in the article I published but forgot about it.
Reply to this