Adding Training to Washington’s Requirements for a Concealed Pistol License

    Steve McLaughlin trains citizens to be responsible weapons owners, particularly for Washington’s concealed pistol licenses (CPL). Naively I asked whether Washington required training before approving a license. He fired his answer with the controlled force of his military training. “No, and that’s the way it should be.”

    For educators like me that’s backwards—people should get trained first, then get a permit.

    Steve is a retired Navy commander who has worked in special forces combat in the Balkans, Africa and Iraq. “Lots of times I’ve fought where people may not carry guns. Without the second amendment, the first amendment, freedom of speech, would not exist.”

    Last week I experienced why our nation’s founders chose the first two amendments. I visited Colonial Williamsburg, historically preserved to pre-revolutionary war years. Actors recreated the fury of townspeople after the royal governor ordered gunpowder removed from the community’s magazine in a middle-of-the-night maneuver.

    Later a woman playing a townsperson identified the wood grained gold-trimmed flintlocks and pistols hung on a magazine wall. The weapons would have stablized my fears if my family lived during that passionate struggle of freedom versus protection. “Who owns these weapons,” I asked?

    “The Crown,” she said.

    Without gunpowder the security from those firearms vanished. I understood why the right to bear arms amendment included the words "shall not be infringed." While Steve supports citizens exercising their constitutional right to bear arms, he worries that they don’t understand their responsibility when carrying a weapon and using it under stressful situations. He said, “They are liable for their bullet's [damage] into and through anyone without [either] endangering themselves, those around them, and beyond.”

    Applications for a CPL are at the Sheriff’s office. It’s comforting that Washington prohibits people from owning a license for a number of reasons. Rhonda Pickering, records supervisor said reasons include conviction or adjudication for any felony charges and crimes committed by one household member against another, such as assault in the fourth degree and stalking. Federal law prohibits possession of a firearm for anyone convicted of domestic violence, adjudicated as mentally defective and other factors.   

    Rhonda said information about training has not been shared with their office, but training is going on. She said, “We’ve had an influx in the last six-to-nine months from people getting fingerprints for a Utah license.”

What? Training is offered by two organizations recommended in the November/December 2009 newsletter of the NCW Gun Club. They are Firearms Academy of Wenatchee operated by Ron Skaggs and Jake Davis and Fortis NRA Training operated by Steve McLaughlin and Shawn Mahood. Mahood is authorized to provide Utah’s four-hour certified training as a prerequisite to getting a license. He advises students to get fingerprinted locally and apply for a Utah license that is valid in more states than Washington’s. 

    Training needs to stress differences in state laws. In Washington you cannot step up to a bar with your weapon. In Utah, you must inform an officer immediately that you are carrying a loaded, permitted weapon. Otherwise an officer who sees it may act on the assumption it is a personal threat.

    I asked Rhonda if she thought people should get training. “Oh yeah, definitely. Sometimes it’s a little scary to see who’s getting a permit. If we had information from people who offered training, we’d hand it out.”

Washington should require a certified training course for people who want a concealed pistol license like Utah.
    Even qualified trainers recommend the training, although they recoil at the idea of additional governmental restriction. My opinion is we’d be doing the owners and all of us a favor. 

 
Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • 4/17/2010 2:04 PM Claudia wrote:
    Any action to limit gun ownership brings with it an equal or stronger reaction from the NRA and like minded individuals. Limitation or regulation is seen as the beginning of a gun ban and taken as the "first shot." It is so unfortunate that those who cannot comprehend or refuse to believe the statistics on deaths and violence due to guns are the same people who would be carrying hidden weapons if allowed and who vehemently condemn any and all gun ownership limitations. There seems to be a strong link between violent personalities and beligerant attitudes and those who would bear arms at all times without limitations.
    This is a warning sign in and of itself in my opinion.
    Yes I own several guns also, but have taken firearm and safety courses and I believe such training should be mandatory. We also need to close loopholes in the gun sales at gun shows and restrict where and when guns can be carried.
    Reply to this
    1. 5/20/2010 3:46 AM JSR wrote:
          Thank you for taking the firearm and safety courses.  The thought of some people carrying weapons without courses is unselttling. 
      Reply to this
  • 4/19/2010 5:41 PM Paul K. Gray wrote:
    do not disagree with the need for education before a permit is issued. I would also like to see an annual refresher course and 'range time' requirement with the permit holder's weapon or weapons of choice. I would also like to see a 'cooling off' period for anyone who uses a weapon in self defense much as law enforcement personnel face after a gun drawn and/or fired incident.



    A point of interest; The Washington Concealed Weapons law and permit system covers more than just firearms. It defines what is a concealable weapon. Sadly, this law includes non-sprung, locking blade knives of the types in common use by people such as electricians and emergency medical responders.
    Reply to this
    1. 5/20/2010 3:44 AM JSR wrote:
        Your comments about refresher courses make a lot sense.  As you know unused skill levels decline steadily, and under pressure situations we tend to think we are still as capable as were at our best.  That can be tragic.
        Thanks for the reminder on the extra items that require obtaining permits.  That's another layer of administrative hassle that interferes with efficiency, but seems avoidable. Jim
      Reply to this
  • 6/23/2010 6:51 AM Annual Travel Insurance wrote:
    I was shocked that training is not necessary before a firearm license is issued to a firearm owner!! How worse can it get?? We see so many cases of shootings even in schools where they manage to bring firearms to school? We have to consider this major issue with all seriousness before waiting for a tragedy to happen before it is enforced (as is usually done!!) In fact, I think it would be a great idea to ban issuing license of firearms to the youth as they are the ones who are most prone to become victims in gang fights, honor killings, etc!
    Reply to this

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.