We’ve Been Failing Our Vision of the Apple Capital Loop Trail

    At Sen. Linda Evan Parlette’s request, Washington Sec. of Transportation Hammond discussed our Apple Capital Loop Trail with community leaders in November 2007. She committed to support it. She’s still committed, but we’ve failed her and ourselves so far.

    We produced priorities in the More-Than-A-Trail report, but no action. Hammond said we need to act. 

    A year ago Parlette wrote the two governments saying Hammond requested a letter about plans and time frames based on the report’s priorities.

    Last February Hammond wrote requesting such a letter.

    Instead on October 12 the municipalities wrote a joint letter to Parlette. They sent Hammond a copy. The letter was a failure.

    On November 15 Hammond wrote a letter thanking them for sending her a copy. Then she expressed disappointment they were unable to complete the planning. She requested they send her a letter, a better letter. She warned, “There is an urgency to develop a plan.” 

    On December 1 Parlette responded to their letter by recommending they send Hammond the letter she requested. Hammond recommended four steps:

  1. “Develop some form of minimal trail right-of-way plan to protect the trail proper as well as a plan to provide public access to the river, while a more formal complete community plan and vision for the area is developed.
  2. “Focus on developing a plan and vision without letting the lack of knowing funding sources to acquire the property to bog the process down. This plan can then serve as a contingency plan should the legislature direct WSDOT to begin selling the property.
  3. “Update the comprehensive plans and associated zoning designations so expectation are clear.
  4. “Identify an acquisition and maintenance strategy.”

    The two municipalities’ failure to respond indicates they need help. Here are suggestions to handle Hammond’s checklist.

    First the two municipalities should immediately authorize funds to plan a minimum trail right-of-way. The City of East Wenatchee recognizes it must respond and Ken Stanton, County Commissioner said, “We’ll take this up at the first of year. It’s a concern.”

    Second, the municipalities should welcome leader action. Dozens of leaders participated in the More Than A Trail’s report. Other leaders could come from advocacy groups such as Save Our Trail, Extend the Loop Coalition, Chelan Douglas Land Trust, conservancy groups, developers and private citizens.

    Leaders must do three things: advocate for public passion about the vision, raise funds to complete the comprehensive plan and create the community organization to achieve the acquisition and maintenance strategy. 

    Advocates would energize people who know the legislature must find funds to balance the deficit. Hammond wrote, “There needs to be continual progress or the opportunity could be lost.”

    Leaders need to find money to complete comprehensive planning. Nancy Warner, Director of the Initiative for Rural Innovation and Stewardship, agrees based on her studies of community successes. “Start with the vision and find the money.”

    Finally, leaders need to identify a community organization to acquire and maintain the eastside shoreline of the public trail. The Eastmont Metro Parks and Recreation District is such an organization and currently maintains the trail under agreements with the City and the County.

    However, Director of Parks Dave Schwab explains his organization is not permitted to advocate for action on the trail. He also says his taxing district has limited resources from its citizen tax base that turned down the last two bond measures. “We’re using all the resources we currently have to bring up facilities to a current state of repair.”

    Asked about a valley wide organization that could acquire the entire Loop, he said such an organization exists in Clark County, The Greater Clark Park District. “It generates revenue to buy properties and spreads the cost over all the residents who’ll benefit. They propose bond measures and buy property. If it passes they transfer, sell, or lease it, and go dormant again.”

    Ultimately a comprehensive auction could raise millions for the legislature and permit private development consistent with our vision. Mitch Reister, a project engineer in the local WSDOT office, estimated it could take one-to-three years to conduct an auction on the east shoreline surplus properties. But surplusing small parcels are quicker. “We do those within months under current budgets.”

    Legislative directives to surplus small parcels could damage or destroy our vision.

    Hammond said, “I cannot stress your timely completion of this process enough.”

    Call a meeting or somebody. Warner recommended people could share on my blog, http://blog.jamessrussell.com. You can comment on Facebook at a group called “More Than A Trail?”  Be sure to search with the question mark.

    We need to lead.

 
Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • 12/17/2010 2:48 AM Cliff Bates wrote:
    The Save the Riverfront Committee (STRC) saved the riverfront 25 years ago,and it sits today only with a bike trail on it! It was passed over for Exhibit R projects due to the potential highway that was going to be built.
    At the time we were told by the State Parks that this right of way was rated in the "top 5%"in the entire State for its recreational potential.
    After the right of way was saved we were told there was no funding due to budget problems. Today, 25 years later we still hear the same damn thing!
    Think for a minute what the tourist economy of the Wenatchee area would be like if the bike trail and the Exhibit R Projects had not been built. The only recreational attraction would still be Mission Ridge.
    The governing fathers of this area are to concerned with budgets, and not the potential of what the returns could be to the area.
    If Microsoft were to locate here, but needed land donated to them to show the area's governing fathers good will toward their move, you can bet no stone would be unturned in their efforts to please Microsoft. And yet the potential of the riverfront recreational benefits is just as great as any major business. Look at what the Exhibit R Projects did for Wenatchee.
    The East Wenatchee area still is playing 2nd fiddle to Wenatchee, taking the hand me downs, rather than leading. The East Wenatchee area has the development space for homes and business that Wenatchee is running out of. It has 9 miles of riverfront that ANY OTHER TOWN would cherish the opportunity to have. And yet the governing fathers sit idly by either to scared, or with a total lack of foresight to do anything.
    At least for God sake, commit to saving the area before the opportunity is lost so those who come later can at least thank you for the opportunity you gave them to develop the area in a controlled way.
    The Save the Riverfront Committee saved the area, came up with the trail idea, and got the University of Washington to lay out a basic plan for the trails layout, and development of the riverfront area in recreational parks, residential, and business.
    The STRC laid the foundation for the Chelan Douglas Land Trust, that was "supposed" to maintain pressure on saving the riverfront, but seems to have forgotten its purpose long ago. Just like the City of East Wenatchee and Douglas County.
    If the riverfront highway had been built it would have been a complete and utter disaster to the traffic within the City of East Wenatchee, let alone the loss of the riverfront forever. All
    the local government agencies supported that highway even though they didn't like it....because the WSDOT was to big, and to powerful to fight. And yet 7 people, backed up by hundreds of others who saw the wrong, changed the course of history in the Wenatchee area.
    It was a HARD, HARD fight, but the alternative to the area was worse if we lost. That, and only that, is what kept us going. Now will someone get the guts to do something with that gift!
    Reply to this
    1. 12/22/2010 2:16 PM Joanne Rosenthal wrote:
      Cliff,
      I would like to help but wonder? Who will take the lead in this important effort before it's too late? If there's a meeting planned I'd be happy to attend.

      Also wonder if this might be something that the Nature Conservancy might take an interest in?
      Reply to this
      1. 12/30/2010 6:22 PM Cliff Bates wrote:
        Joanne:

        Your interest is very welcoming, but the problem seems to be everyone is looking for someone else to take the lead. The STRC let it's non profit tax exempt status expire 2 years ago, (after 25 years) because no one was interested in becoming involved enough to commit totally to the cause.
        As I stated in Jim's column, the STRC did all the HARD work, and now it appears it is going to be a wasted effort.
        Wasted in the aspect that STRC DID OUR PART, but now others want "someone else" to AGAIN do their work for them so they can enjoy the results.
        So I will not be taking any lead, nor apparently anyone who used to be on the STRC Board.
        I and the rest will be glad to be very supportive when we are shown someone has the guts to lead and do what is needed to see it through. If not, well I guess the community deserves what becomes of that lost opportunity that it will never have again.
        Unfortunately the Nature Conservancy is only interested in "natural lands" that have not been previously developed. The right-of-way property was cleared of homes and orchards in the late 50's. Consequently it is not considered natural.
        Reply to this
      2. 1/7/2011 1:44 AM Jim Russell wrote:
        There are a number of people who are taking action and, as Cliff warned, not waiting for someone else to take the lead. If you're interested in helping, email me at james.s.russell@frontier.com and we can talk about it. Thanks, Jim
        Reply to this

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.