Clear Skies Common Sense by Jim Russell
Clear Skies Common Sense

Understanding Dogs Better to Help us and Them

      We love dogs and think we know them.
     We could know them better based on my reading of Inside of a Dog: What Dogs, See, Smell and Know by Alexandra Horowitz. Her book is full of information about the history, anatomy and mind of dogs.
     My dog Haley reads me like a book. Karen’s been trying for fifty years, but Haley’s more accurate, probably from lower expectations.
     Nevertheless, we should learn more about dogs so we can reciprocate. In fact we’d do well to learn their tricks so we can do the same for other people in our world. 
     One trick is to accept dogs as dogs, not as people. Horowitz says dogs adapted to humans by shedding ancestral wolf traits. Dogs look people in the eye, wolves avoid eye contact. Wolves live alone or in constantly shifting packs, dogs adapt to a subservient role in a family. Horowitz says we make our dogs unique. “Dogs interpret the world through acting on it, by seeing others act, by being shown, and by acting with us into being a good member of the family.“
     The anatomy of dogs gives them different views of the world and us than we have. Dogs lead with their noses to within millimeters of any object. They push and pull scents into labyrinths of their nostrils, onto to special organs and out unseen slits.  They sniff our legs to identify us. We leave trails of scents. They smell our fear, our diseases and our meals. Horowitz says, “To dogs, we are our scent.”
     We should enrich their lives with scents, but we frequently squelch their interest. After I ate at a restaurant, I spontaneously gave my ten-inch-shoulder-height mongrel a treat. No, not a doggie bag, I ate all my beef pasta. I did better. I stuck my face in front of her nose. She jumped and wagged and smelled and licked my mouth and nose in a joyous welcome. I needed another napkin to wipe off her slobber. I couldn’t survive that every time, but if not, I’ll feel guilty. 
     They spread their smells to socialize. Haley greets dogs in tail-wagging formalities that stretch from noses to genitals. They’re hesitantly, mutually sharing but most of us seem embarrassed by what appear to be lewd intrusions, so we tug them apart before they’re done. Haley’s nose-to-path trot discovers which animals trotted by and how long ago, but we yank her away to finish our joint walk. Some owners hold a dog’s head so high they can’t investigate smells. Horowitz allows her dog periodic walks directed solely by her dog’s nasal fascinations. I’m afraid golfers would hit us with golf balls.  
     Dogs constantly watch us, even when we watch TV.  Their mind receives more images per minute than ours do, meaning they see TV projections as we see freezes in reception. Haley’s eye sockets are filled by large, black pupils. She sees moving images twice as brightly as I can. They snatch Frisbees out of the air. They notice twitches, face movements and breathing patterns we don’t see. They anticipate our moods before we cover them up. They learn to recognize oncoming migraines or heart attacks.
     The book is full of traits we underestimate and underappreciate in our dedicated, dependent canine lovers. Consequently they know us better than we know them, and that is decidedly to our benefit. They’re relentlessly watching us, adapting, testing, expecting a certain leash on life’s essentials, reveling in thoughtful gifts we make available and serving us with profound assistance if they're trained. 
     Observing more about their traits gives us a boundless invitation to get more joy more out of our relationships with them. 
     And learning to enrich relationships with dogs we love leads us to appreciate how much more difficult it is to improve relationships with other people.
     We could better serve each other and enrich our own lives by better observing and gifting our own dogs.

Government is the Problem is a Popular Myth

“Government is the problem,” is a popular myth. Government is inevitably part of the solution. More evidence comes from Washington and Iowa private political parties as they serve their valid causes for the public good. Political partiers have a good time, but there is a morning after. Federal judges have ruled Republican, Democrat, Libertarian and other political parties are private clubs. They’re free to develop their own activities with minimal federal interference. One activity to choose candidates and debate issues is a caucus. Caucuses recruit delegates to county, district and statewide caucuses. On C-Span I watched one seemingly surprised Iowan under thirty become a delegate for Ron Paul because nobody else volunteered. Where will that lead him? Another political party role is committee precinct officer (CPO) at the local level. They run caucuses. Like caucuses, CPOs serve the public good with voter registration drives. They recruit candidates. They escort candidates. They inform others about elections. They raise money by providing cookies and information at highway rest stops. Libertarian ideology says if these private party actions don’t harm anyone else and serve the public good, why should government interfere? Yes, but…<< MORE >>

How Can a Blackout be a Gift?

     Instead of inspiration hitting me so I could write about the frazzled last year and inspire us for the New Year, a blackout hit me atop Saddle Rock. My blackout is a gift because I missed warning signs and made mistakes, and writing with smiles may make it easier to succeed in 2012. 
     Karen, family and I hiked up Saddle Rock after Christmas. Hiking was a triumph after a year dedicated to halting the decline of my heart failure and beginning healing with medications, supplements, a sleep apnea machine and mostly tennis. Saddle Rock was a deserving landmark since its dedication last year as a public treasure was one of the community’s best accomplishments. 
     However my blackout was a setback, and my mistakes remind me to be more tolerant of mistakes like default on Event Center debt. I like to make light of my blackout by claiming the giddy success of standing on Saddle Rock made me lightheaded, but that’s inaccurate. I felt dizzy almost immediately. I reached out to Karen, too late. My eyes rolled back and I tipped backward onto the ground. Karen unsuccessfully reached for me while incorrectly assuming I was dying. It’s comforting to know she was reaching. But she’s getting used to it like most Americans our age who feel we’re unsuccessfully reaching for the slowly vanishing security in Social Security, Medicare, and retirement plans.
     My blackout converted to confusion amid sounds of sirens as our daughter told 911 my pulse was forty. We met Don, my age or older, impressively still on his feet and offering a prayer. We joined hands while the EMT vehicle clawed to the top. I felt a new stillness in my heart as Don prayed, although my pulse may have been picking up speed.
     Stillness inside helped me through short-lived chaos outside. In the oncoming drizzle our emergency vehicle slipped down the slope like values in my 401(K). The slippage unleashed Karen’s acrophobia in her front-seat view and elevated her to the driver’s primary concern. In ER I recovered with a saline-water IV and egg salad sandwich insisting I could go home. The ER physician insisted I stay because of my heart conditions. This time Karen successfully grabbed my cheeks, placed her nose on my nose and confided, “I don’t want you at home.” She should grab the cheeks of political leaders to say, “I don’t want you home until you finish your work.”
     Doctors and nurses hospitalized me for two days. A heart monitor and test results focused on the probable cause: medications, dehydration, over-exertion and standing too quickly interacted with the body’s normal response to slow down the heart after exercise, called a vasovagal response. Blood temporarily drained from my brain. Doctors changed my medications and prescribed a heart monitor for three weeks. 
     The experience unnerved me, but family reminded me it was a gift. They’re right. One night the hospital’s monitor recorded my pulse at 160 just after I wheeled my saline-water IV stand into the bathroom just in time. I thought the shortness of breath was from holding my breath to squeeze my bladder as I often do. It’s difficult to admit I missed those warnings. Federal leaders and investors may feel just as chagrined years from now about ignoring the Standard and Poors downgrade of the US debt.
     I made other mistakes. I didn’t drink enough water on the way up because my water bottle was buried in the bottom of my backpack and Karen was gaining ground on me. Besides the top was always getting closer. I’m more forgiving of Congress regularly thinking it can muddle along as each election gets closer. 
     My blackout gave me better prescriptions and deeper experiences to rein in my enthusiasm. Join me to treat 2011 as a blackout and recommit to the better prescriptions we need to make a more successful 2012.

How to Keep New Year’s Resolutions with Russell’s Rules

     My success with New Year’s resolutions feels flawless now that I’ve discovered my here-to-fore secret technique. Since then every resolution I’ve made, I’ve kept. Suspecting people under our clear skies generally don’t feel as successful, I offer my secrets and provide examples you may want to adopt. 
     First, and perhaps my most important rules: If I don’t feel a need to make a resolution, I don’t make one. I make resolutions about half the time. The other half the time it occurs to me well into the month of January that I’m without a resolution. Having gone that long, it’s clear I can survive the year without one, and resolve to do so. You could say my resolution to have no resolution is a resolution, and I’ll accept your interpretation, meaning I make resolutions every year and always succeed. I’m fine with either interpretation.
     My resolutions are attitudinal, rather than specific, netted down to one or two words. For example one year my resolution was ‘balance.’ Balance means avoiding wild swings of commitment plunging me into late nights and early mornings against my will, tossing and turning at night about fewer floundering projects, or being overwhelmed by long to-do lists that interfere with my family, business or service interests.
     I’ve succeeded by creating an unavoidable reminder, such as inserting balance as my computer screensaver, or ‘I am A-OK” on my cell phone. I thought about balance frequently, perhaps daily, but I wasn’t at my computer every day so I can’t be sure. Nevertheless resolutions infuse my attitude throughout the year. I’m pleased to come across quotes aligning me with the biblical word such as, “A just balance and the scales are the Lord’s,” and with long standing philosophical wisdom such as “I’m OK, You’re OK.” At year’s end I’ve congratulated myself on my deep commitment to those attitudes that improved my outlook on life. 
     Some of you may question whether proof of my success exists in tangible, measurable indicators. True, well-intentioned people resolve to lose weight by marking down a number from a scale at the beginning of the year to compare with a target at the end of the year. Count me not among those self-tormented souls. They spend money to buy work-out equipment they later sell at a loss, become members in athletic clubs they gradually avoid, or purchase packets of recommended meals, all the while growing increasingly anxious as they hurtle towards an inaccessible self-imposed weight at the New Year, rendering them unable to enjoy the Christmas season with the beneficence of neighbors bringing irresistible delectables, such as Karen’s acclaimed fudge. 
     Besides, how would you recommend I measure balance? Isn’t it evidentiary data I’m more balanced if I feel more balanced? Isn’t the fact that balance is a present theme in my life after all these years sufficient proof that my resolution was even more successful than I realized before resolving to write this article? Does not such evidence warrant more faith than a comparison between two numbers gathered on particular days at particular times from a weight scale that is notorious for wobbling out of alignment, or from a new scale purchased to replace the one accused of obviously overweighting as some resolutionists I’ve known have done?   
     Without fear and with enthusiasm I’ve chosen my new resolution and resolved to share it with you. Part of my fearlessness is my able ally, our 14-pound canine comet Haley, who should help me every day when she zooms into my lap after returning from outside. Even more satisfying should be watching my resolution spread across the faces of people around me throughout the year. Haley wags her tail harder when she sees one. My resolution is smile.  
     Try my system this year. Imagine the fun you’ll have thinking about an attitude of a successful resolution in your happy new year and next year’s Christmas celebrations. The thought of you joining Haley, Karen and me in such a celebration makes me smile. 

A Gift for My Family and Yours: Stories of Healing

The back cover of Stories of Healing: A Family Doctor’s Journal by East Wenatchee resident Robert A Anderson, MD, (retired) has two influential recommendations. One is from Christiane Northrup, MD, Ob/Gyn, who called it “a fantastic book written by one of the finest holistic doctors I’ve ever known.” She knows books: she authored three New York Times Bestsellers including The Wisdom of Menopause.  Bernard Siegel, MD, author of 12 best sellers beginning with Love, Medicine and Miracles, wrote, “This book needs to be read by everyone.” 

 Anderson’s book is a memoir of patients selected from his 40-year family practice in Edmonds who transformed his original physician’s perspective after graduating from Washington’s medical school. He converted from believing he was solely a medical expert with “an opportunity and duty to treat and educate my patients” [to] “realize that my patients were simultaneously teaching me. I believe the energy of all avenues to recovery, cure and healing involves the potential for self-healing from within.” 

The stories begin with medical protocol and end with patient success. He describes symptoms, tests and reports from specialists. After prescribed medications were either unsatisfactory, or where other treatments could be tried simultaneously, he confers with patients about optional approaches they could choose. Those options were based on research he’d reviewed and treatments he found effective for himself or patients. Examples include, zinc-based cream for warts, self-imaging to relieve anxiety and daily dosages of magnesium to prevent and treat heart failure.  

Stories of heart care riveted my attention because of my cardiomyopathy. The congestive heart failure of 65-year-old Audrey (names are fictitious) deteriorated to 11 percent efficiency from a normal 60 percent over five years while she was on 14 medications. She needed to catch her breath every five stair-steps. Anderson states, “Her downhill course allowed me to be comfortable in sketching out some ‘why-not’ options which I knew would not interfere with any of the treatments her cardiologist had recommended.” The story list vitamins, enzymes and minerals he suggested she try and references his book published by McGraw-Hill in 2001, Clinician’s Guide to Holistic Medicine. Nine years later her heart efficiency maintained an above-normal 75 percent and her cardiologist eliminated all medications save one. 

The first forty stories have self-healing themes. Patients chose to different lifestyles and nutritional intake to help heal themselves. They collaborated with Anderson to reduce his ideal recommendations to actions they could maintain. He found they healed better than if they ignored his recommendations and got no benefits. They also worked to recognize whether their particular illness occurred at a particular time. And Anderson explains how each case taught him another lesson. 

The Mysterium section contains incredulous experiences tangentally related to self-healing. A hospital-assigned pediatrician arrived to give inpatient care to Anderson’s newborn granddaughter. The pediatrician mysteriously returned to ask her parent’s permission to diagnose meningitis, which led to quick treatments that avoided brain damage. After two follow-up visits with her parents, the pediatrician disappeared. Archived records of the pediatrician’s inpatient care are missing. 

Anderson told me he included the Mysterium stories for two reasons. He believes we should pay more attention to anomalies because they’ve catapulted medical advancements throughout history, such as the discovery of penicillin. He also said, “Weird things happen and I’m more accepting and honoring of patients’ experiences, particularly when one happens to a ‘non-zany’ nurse in my office,” referring to her dream in the last story of the book. 

Anderson wrote this book for patients following three research books for physicians. He said, “Stories are important for people.”

They’ve inspired me and may inspire others. I’m giving them to my children for Christmas.



How Have We Declared War for the Last Seventy Years?

            December 8, 2011 was the seventieth anniversary of the last declaration of war issued by Congress and signed by the President. The historic picture of Roosevelt signing Congress’s declaration was my childhood image of the U.S. resolutely united in a war against evil.

             On the anniversary I read a website by news junkie Maureen Holland identifying eighty “US Military Interventions and Wars Since 1941.” I was unable to find a consistent process, let alone rationale. Commander-In-Chief Obama deployed forces for a regime change in Libya with no clear opposition party. Monday on C-Span presidential candidates Huntsman and Gingrich said Iran is our most important threat because of its nuclear capabilities and we must commit to a regime change. We’ve done regime changes to install Iran’s Shah, Iraq’s Hussein, Afghanistan’s Karzai and Panama’s Noriega.

            How have we decided to go to war since WWII? I’m not focusing on what is a just war, just worrying about how we decide.  

Engaging military forces are authorized by our Constitution, our UN Treaty and the War Powers Act.

Our Constitution authorizes Congress to declare war, but doesn’t explain how. Congress has enumerated authority, “to raise and support armies and provide and maintain a navy.” Our constitution also states, “The president shall be commander in chief of the army and navy of the United States … when called into the actual service of the United States.”

Our Constitution authorizes both branches, independently -- at least according leaders in each branch.

After WWII Congress authorized two wars in Lebanon, Vietnam (after troops had been there for four years), both recent Iraq wars and Afghanistan.

In 1945 the Senate ratified the United Nations Charter empowering the UN Security Council to establish peacekeeping operations, international sanctions and military action through UNSC resolutions. Prior to Congressional approval, our Commanders-In-Chief have committed forces under UNSC resolutions in Korea, Bosnia, a Liberian war, Haiti, and most recently Libya, although Congress eventually funded them.

Congress passed The War Powers Act over President Nixon’s veto in 1973 to limit presidential war powers after the Vietnam War. The WPA’s purpose is insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances.”

‘Imminent hositilities’is a euphemism for our soldiers likely dying in combat. Contrast that wording with “Operation Killer,” the first offensive against the Chinese in Korea by General Matthew Ridgway, who was assigned command to revive the demoralized Eighth Army and UN Forces. Warned by his PR people the term was too bloodthirsty, he ignored them and later wrote, “I am by nature opposed to any effort to ‘sell’ war to people as only mildly unpleasant business that requires little in the way of blood.” If we’re going to decide on war, let’s not sell it.

The WPA requires a president who has already deployed significant troops of to inform Congress within 48 hours and restricts engagement to 60 days plus 30 days for a withdrawal, unless Congress authorizes a longer period or declares war. The example referenced was Kennedy’s increase of US Vietnam military advisers from 700 to 16,000.

A report on the WPA after thirty years indicates Congressional leaders invoked the act after Vietnam evacuations, the Iranian rescue, El Salvador military advising, Honduran military exercises, Nicaragua military training, Lebanon multi-national forces, Grenada riot control, Libyan bombing runs in 1986, Panama regime change, Haiti regime change and armed conflict, Kosovo, and most recently Libya.

The report concluded, “Every President since the enactment of the WPA has taken the position that it is an unconstitutional infringement on the President’s authority as Commander-In-Chief.” Obama ignored the reporting requirement in Libya because he concluded military involvement wasn’t significant. Members in Congressional sessions that haven’t had a majority to enforce the WPA have filed lawsuits to enforce it, but courts have insisted Congress must enforce it first.

The War Powers Act has added new reports and discussions without resolving final authority.

But we’ve been involved in numerous military interventions not covered by these authorizations. One example: from 1976-1992 the CIA assisted South African armed rebels from Angola while Nelson Mandela was overthrowing his government with non-violence.

Eisenhower declined one intervention on the advice of Ridgway who had become Army Chief of Staff. Eisenhower was under pressure to send troops to rescue French forces trapped by Vietminh at Dien Bien Phu in French Indochina. Ridgway’s powerful memo predicting the deaths and destruction of American forces convinced Eisenhower to avoid a wasteful intervention.  

I worry commanding war solutions gives the false appearance of quick solutions and endangers too many lives, particularly as we face a future with increasing threats of nuclear powers in Iran and Pakistan. And I don’t see a consistent process, or a deep commitment, to reach a “collective judgment of both Congress and the President” to use armed forces with a realistic understanding of the costs.

We should strengthen collective judgments before we approve war, and perhaps avoid it more often.

The Wenatchee Arena Bill Has Died in the Senate

Below is the statement by Sen. Linda Evans Parlette concernin the Public Facilities District Bill. It has failed to pass the Senate. I'm disappointed by very pleased Sen Parlette and Reps. Amstrong and Condotta made the effort and got as far as they did. It was a long shot but well worth the effort to avoid what I believe we now have to endure. Jim Russell Parlette statement on Public Facilities District bill Yesterday the state Senate sent House Bill 2145, the measure that would have paid bondholders affected by the Greater Wenatchee Public Facilities District default, to the Senate Ways and Means Committee. Because the measure lacked enough support to be voted out of the committee, it is not expected to receive further consideration.<< MORE >>

The Amended Arena Bill Gives Wenatchee a Chance.

The House passed the Arena Bill Monday by a vote of 56-33, but with an amendment that split the district representatives. The amendment eliminates the ability of councils and jurisdictions to impose a sale and use tax of 0.2 percent without voter approval. Rep. Condotta voted in favor because House Speaker Chopp said the bill wouldn’t pass without the amendment. I believe it deserves passage.<< MORE >>

House Ways and Means Approves Arena Revised Bill

The House Ways and Means Committee just passed the revised Arena Bill that includes the fact that the debt is now in default. Rueven Carlyle spoke in support of it and voted for passage. It now goes the House floor for a vote on passage.  Speaker Chopp told TV-W this morning he is favor of the bill and expects to have a vote on it within a day or two.

The Senate Ways and Means Committee is next.  

Can We All Stand Up or Stand By as Good Neighbors on the Arena Debt?

As I write this blog our legislature is probably not going to pass legislation authorizing the Treasurery to pay the Arena’s $42 million Bond Anticipation Notes on December 1 – but it should. Assuming it is resurrected and passed, Wenatchee City leadership would be needed and must be supported by neighboring municipalities and us as citizens. << MORE >>

Subscribe